By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lafiel said:
jlrx said:
The last TV I bought (a couple years ago) was right before all the 3DTV's came out (After the LED-LCD ones came out though) and I would not have bought one then, but having one of my computer monitors as a 3D Monitor has convinced me of the value of 3D Entertainment (not that my 3DS didn't). So the next TV I purchase will infact be a 3D ready set, at the moment I am leaning towards active shutter glasses as they seem to be the best for picture and brightness.

Hmm.. with the shutter technique you have real 1080p per eye so it certainly has better picture quality at the moment, but I'm not sure about brightness.. I have an active 3D monitor aswell and it's actually a little too dark in 3D mode, so I really prefer to play content with bright colors.

I strongly prefer the 'Passive' form of 3D TVs.  I am aware that it halves the resolution - which is why I would like a 2K 3D TV - so you could get each eye in 1080P, but the additional picture quality from processing is so much better.  You get free of the 2:3 pull down, judder free, 24p and the additional 'smoothing' from the extra frames of 120+ Hz. 

Plus the glasses are lighter and don't need batteries. Till we have glasses free, it seems to me the best option.

I find the 60 frames per eye, just way to slow.  In the same way a DLP project system in a Cinema is not satisfactory to me.  It’s like a bad disco shorting out with all the flicker.  



 

Really not sure I see any point of Consol over PC's since Kinect, Wii and other alternative ways to play have been abandoned. 

Top 50 'most fun' game list coming soon!

 

Tell me a funny joke!