Lafiel said:
Hmm.. with the shutter technique you have real 1080p per eye so it certainly has better picture quality at the moment, but I'm not sure about brightness.. I have an active 3D monitor aswell and it's actually a little too dark in 3D mode, so I really prefer to play content with bright colors. |
I strongly prefer the 'Passive' form of 3D TVs. I am aware that it halves the resolution - which is why I would like a 2K 3D TV - so you could get each eye in 1080P, but the additional picture quality from processing is so much better. You get free of the 2:3 pull down, judder free, 24p and the additional 'smoothing' from the extra frames of 120+ Hz.
Plus the glasses are lighter and don't need batteries. Till we have glasses free, it seems to me the best option.
I find the 60 frames per eye, just way to slow. In the same way a DLP project system in a Cinema is not satisfactory to me. It’s like a bad disco shorting out with all the flicker.







