A virus that kills cancer: the cure that's waiting in the cold

[wfz]

michael_stutzer said:

 

You are saying that these things don't get more funding because they will die anyway and they cost us money, which means only old people have cancer.There is a "because" in your post which means they are related. And if you insist that they are unrelated then you are completely off-topic, you might as well talk about preorder charts.

No need to act so defensive and butthurt. :P I brought up relevant points to this thread's discussion, and my extra two cents were running off topic. I was still talking about saving lives and health care, so I think it was a biiiiit more on topic than discussing charts. =)

If you're so upset and adamant that we stay on topic, how come you didn't respond to the part of my post that directly related to this thread? The fact that a cure has been found years ago and it was essentially shunned from society, even when a few recent tests show it works properly and should be looked further into.

Concerning, wouldn't you agree? One theory was that it was too simplistic (monetarily speaking) and wouldn't make large medical companies much money, so since they didn't see a great monetary investment in it, they don't care about it. This leads to the thought that these medical companies care more about making money than saving lives. It's just a theory, however.

 

I wonder what will come of this new method.