Roma said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Roma said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Roma said:
I think its a good thing Nintendo is taking it slower than the other two. Nintendo is the only one really thinking long term rather than short term by killing most developers or getting less games out.
each gen that passe will kill studios and or make them go to mobile where they might get more out of them while spending less on each project
|
Nintendos games are generally cheaper than most AAA titles dude. Zelda and Metroid are the only real standout pricey titles. Nintendo is one of the more frugal companies. It's Sony and Microsoft who spent shit tons on risky projects. Microsoft eventually gave up but Sony is still going at it.
|
its a good thing you told me cuz I didn't know that >_>
as for risky project well Wii and WiiU are far riskier than the "just add more power" safe risky 
|
Nintendo takes risk, but mostly on hardware. They haven't taken risk on games in a good long while.
|
Mario Galaxy is really different than what Mario usually is so no it hasn't been long since they risk in games either
and changing art stiles in Zelda is also risky
making Kirby feel like pants?
|
I've loved almost every Mario game I've played except for 2, Paper Mario and Mario RPG. I don't consider making a mario game a risk. Give it the mario feel change the environment if you must but the experimentation will always be done with it. They kind of went back to square one with Mario, but yeah its still cool though. When I say risk as well I mean new IP risk.
