happydolphin said:
It's not just that, it's horribly biased. I told you they made controllers before, but now you're saying they wouldn't make it for Wii because it's expensive, how is that a reason? They did it for Tatsunoko! That's argument enough. With just that all your other reasons are just excuses. (it's not a surprise to me Oni, you tend to look for excuses as to why devs would shun Nintendo) About Cube owners. what does it matter whether they had a PS2 or not, it wouldn't change the fact that they later owned a Wii and had the option of buying SFIV on the Wii were it offered. Whether it's all who bought a Wii or not is unimportant, the basic assumption is that a good majority did (by definition of them being core Nintendo gamers), so even if it were 10 million it would be enough of a userbase. Regardless, Smash sold 10 million, SF could sell a few as well. |
There not excuses they are reasons, you just want to believe the conspiracy bunk of 3rd parties having something against Ninty, your welcome to believe that, but i sure wont. How is it being expensive not a reason?? Yeah they did it for Tvs.C that is niche game. SF is there real bread and butter they have to get that baby in as much peoples hands as possible. How they gonna do that when the standard controlller for the Wii doesnt do it justice at all? They would have to make alot of controllers, how much of those fighting sticks you think they make??? Im sure that they are not making a millions of those.
Smash Bros aint the same game as SF, not even close completly different mechanics. Just cause people bought Smash doesnt mean they will buy SF. How many people bought Wii Fit, not how much people bought say EA Active?? ANd no they are not biased since the 3ds ended up with a SF anyway, so that means one of two things. They just didnt wanna deal with Wii for reasons ive already stated or maybe it took that long for Ninty and them to come to an agreement







