Chark said:
|
Well switching to using an average across a number of weeks is simple enough.
I mean your formula now is probably something like this:
[week n] = ( [week n-1] / [average of week n-53] * 100 ) / 100 * [average of week n-52]
The bit between the rounded brackets is what works out the percentage Vita is selling compared to the 2011 average... as long as the "week n-1" period corresponds with the "week n-53" period it can be any length you want. I think a period of 1-3 months is best because it doesn't get skewed too much by anomalous weeks but also doesn't go too far back in time including possibly irrelevant data (particularly in the Vita's case as going back more than 6 months would include launch sales)
And regarding crow eating, if the prediction graph shoots up because of an anomalous week, it's only going to come down again in the following week or two.
Looking at next weeks sales for example with Japan at ~50k and the usual 20k in the West: Assuming I am still correctly interpreting your formula your graph is going to be predicting the Vita to more than double the current prediction for the rest of the year, bringing the end of year total to around 5.5 million. Then if past trends in Japan are anything to go by, the following week Vita will be sub 30k in Japan, then sub 15k again the week after and your graph will be showing an end of year about 4.1 or 4.2 million again. (at least assuming there aren't any other special bundles in Japan I am unaware of)








