Kasz216 said:
Not even getting into the problems with that theory. Not all wealth is matieral... I mean, your on a computer right now... on a website, about videogames. Videogames are a form of wealth... and they're digital. Furthermore, there are tons of mateirals that were worthless hundreds of years ago, that are worth tons now. As new products get made, "finite" products get more valuable. Not everybody can be flying around in airplanes made out of pure gold, however people can continue to live better and better lives through investment, hardwork and increasing the value of things. Working for "inner joy" however, that actually IS something that is finite and largely impossible. Everyone wants to be a poet, writer, teacher or something like that. No one wants to be a garbage man. Even people who enjoy it, do so because it's easy and they get paid. There isn't anyone who's going to be a garbage man on their free time as a hobby. |
The problem isn't the finiteness of wealth. The question is if they are going to let us put our hands on some.
30 years ago one member of a family with an average job (the father), was able to earn enough money for a house, a car, 2-3 kids. Now both parents have a job. With 2x income we should be living like kings, with two houses and driving BMW's, right?..... but it didn't happen. In fact, it's the opposite.
Possible answers:
a) This happened for no reason at all.
b) Some people did it on purpose to get even richer.







