By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pezus said:
ninetailschris said:

 

What's left to say?

 



You're basically discrediting the anonymous source with no proof. Why exactly would they create such an article with lies? And no, if I know Nintendo right, we won't be getting tech specs come September.

And, like Scoobes said above, this is what the majority of articles and rumors has pointed at before. It's not like this is something of a new revelation. You can be in denial all you want, but I just hope you won't be in denial after we get the confirmation.

And your discrediting the real sources like Epic with no proof. I find it odd people rather listen to anonymous sources who, after they've been proven wrong, will never be heard from again than to sources who have put their name out there along with their statements.

Also, I find it very odd the anonymous sources can't say a thing about clock speeds, amount of shaders or other specific details. It's all just unspecified guesses really.
It should be very easy to determine technical specifications when you have the hardware. Especially things like the amount of shader processors.
Furthermore, as others have pointed out, the rumors regarding the Wii U have gone all over the place. The only thing that seems consistent is the 1.5 GB of RAM. Are we to believe the Eurogamer rumors and ignore all the other rumors? Or is it the other way around? What gives the Eurogamer rumors more credibility than other sites' rumors?

To me it looks like you want to believe the Wii U isn't powerful because it's the Wii U.