pezus said:
God I wish you actually read the article |
Let's play did you read carefully?
""The Wii U is a nice console to work with because it's got so much RAM in comparison [to the PS3 and Xbox 360]," another Wii U developer, who wished [to remain anonymous], told us. "For E3 we simply dumped the whole game into memory and never once used the disc after the content was loaded from it.""
Positive or bad anoymous have no creditability.
""We're a GPU-heavy game," [the source continued]. "Wii U has a powerful GPU with more oomph than the rivals - and is more modern in architecture and shader support, which may come in handy later on.
"The CPU on the other hand is a different question. We are not limited by it but some other games might suffer from it. Still, because of the GPU, I expect most multi-platform games to look the best on Wii U, even if the difference might not be huge sometimes."
The mention of the Wii U's CPU raised our eyebrow - as it has done for many developers we've spoken to. While its clock speed remains private, most developers agree it is lower than the clock speed offered by the PS3 and Xbox 360's CPUs - disappointing for many.
It remains to be seen what impact this will have in the future, but we've been able to ascertain the impact it has already had. We were told that when early Wii U developer kits were sent to studios, Nintendo indicated the console would support four GamePads at the same time. But as the dev kits were refined and the tech specs fell into place, it became apparent this would not be the case."
^ All this from a source that is anoymous? Pezus wish you read carefully now?
"Then, the Wii U will lag significantly behind in the graphics stakes. At least, that's what we're [being told]. The next Xbox, we understand, allows developers to use the DX11 graphics standard to easily shift code from PC to the console. The Wii U supports DX10 (one of the reasons you won't see an Unreal Engine 4 game on it). And let's not forget that processor."
Who told you Eurogamer? Oh wait it's anoymous too right? Pezus look at this great proof man. Damn wish i read like you did. Hmm.
"The Wii U versions of multi-platform games shown to the public have done little to fill Nintendo fans with confidence. The Wii U version of Batman: Arkham City looks poor in comparison to the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions, and the less said about Ninja Gaiden 3 on Wii U the better."
Come on guys if you can't see how idiotic this is then there something wrong with you. You can look up videos on youtube saying that when they played batman on Wii-U it looked better even the people who are amking it said it will look better. Where did he even get this from anoymous sorces again? Ninja Gaiden 3 one made me laugh because they said it will look better too. This whole article when quoting names never said anything negative about the wii-u yet the anoymous sources did? Hmm wonder who are these guys the same guys that said batman looked worst? LOL. Anoymous Source = Writer to get hits.
"Indeed, we've seen this before the console has launched. [One develope]r working on a Wii U launch game told us he was able to optimise his game's CPU main core usage by up to 15 per cent throughout the course of development, and further optimisations are expected before the game comes out."
Ok? Who is this one developer? See the pattern? This article is full of anoymous sources with real sources so you get confused and think everything is legit.
Pezus I think its obvious you loss this one.
We been getting SPec reveals every damn week now this one is no different.
I probably wouldn't even trust them to quote someone correctly after article with Sega. There trying to do damage control so that article doesn't make them look so bad. It's sad but Eurogamer is a untrusted site.
Wait till 9/13 that's when we will get facts not based on I talk to random person whon will not be sourced.
What's left to say?
"Excuse me sir, I see you have a weapon. Why don't you put it down and let's settle this like gentlemen" ~ max
