That's the problem,at least MS show "yeah we're making 360&nextbox become multimedia device,what?problem?don't buy it."(of course we should ignore how many studios they build/bought in last 2 years and let's talk about FASA Ensemble etc)
Sony...ah wait,we're in game discussion aka sony discussion#2(Please ignore what they're closed even in this year and just talk about they bought sucker punch Media Molecule etc)
But it's "nice" to see just because a game have another name that means it is very creative(=don't need to care what genre of the game is)
And you know,if any 360 game VGCer don't like,it's not a game.if any new PS3 game announced by SCE,it will automatic become a great game(at least until it release)
What games did Microsoft announce between Gears and the arcade titles? Oh wait...sorry..Usher is exclusive.
Too bad Dance Central series is good series
And wtf is "between Gears and arcade titles"?XBLA are not 1 genre
But you show your face,that's good
Please...XBLA is nothing to brag about at E3 of all place. Its a true indicator that you dont care about major development IP's. Indy titles are being published and worked on by Sony and Microsoft subordinates so it doesnt matter either way.
Best and most interesting looking downloadable game Ive seen.
Good looking game but its a smaller title. Sony indy exclusives tend to be more adventurous, ambitious and different, but that doesnt change the fact that smaller games shouldn't be boasted about when you've got retail exclusive or handheld titles to talk about. The people who buy are a niche of the overall market.