Euphoria14 said:
Scoobes said:
Euphoria14 said:
It's the same choice everyone gives you. Crap, good or great.
|
No, it's not. With Android it's crap, good or great and everything in between. For instance, I want a phone with a game pad, Sony have the Xperia Play, Apple have... nothing. Or maybe someone wants a small phone because they don't like carrying something as large as most modern smartphones. They could go for an Xperia Mini or maybe a Galaxy Mini 2. With Apple, again, nothing in this range. Or maybe some guy wants a large tablet sized phone 'cos he has a small "package", he could go for Galaxy Note. Once again, Apple have nothing in this range. He could go for an iPad, but then he wouldn't have a phone. How about a keyboard? Andoid: Maybe a Droid 4 or Xperia Pro. Apple... hmmm....
So yeah, it's not the same choice the other manufacturers give you.
|
Were arguing internal specs.
The Play is not top tier. I don't think it has above 2.3. Could be wrong.
|
In specs it's the same story though. You don't only have 3 categories and with Android devices (and WP7 devices) you have a lot of choices so you can choose a phone that meets your direct needs. With Apple you only have a choice of old, not so old and current. No real customisation and no selecting based on your individual needs.
The Play isn't top tier. I have one and it's showing its age a bit. Control pad is still quite nice for games and they did try updating to 4.0 but couldn't get the control pad drivers to work with the new OS. The disadvantage of having lots of devices for a single OS, lol.
