NiKKoM said:
Well IMAX is a different story that's a 70mm film and the resolution would be much greater then 4k.. thing is that it's incredible expensive.. But the normal film the resolution is much higher than 1080p but since the old movies are already having a lot of trouble getting a good 1080p version (original Star Wars) because of the quality of the 35mm reels.. they used chemical, so over time it will be affected and degrade the image quality.. but you are right if you had a fresh super 35mm completly uneffected by time it would be benefitial to remaster them at 4K... |
So IMAX is expensive, but many recent films have still used it right and would benefit from being remastered at 4k? What would the horizontal resolution be of a film from the 60's and a film from the 00's, complete with the soundtrack? You said it wouldn't come close to 3840, but wouldn't anything over 3000, still closer to 4k than 1080p, still be worth the remaster?
As for films degrading over time, how easy is it to restore them? After seeing how great the Bond films looked in 1080p, I assumed that anything from the 80's or later wouldn't have suffered enough for it not to be worth remastering in 4k.
Sorry for all the questions, I don't know much about film.
EDIT: I see why you mentioned Super 35 and posted those pictures because the soundtrack is missing on that one.








