CGI-Quality said:
20happyballs said:
CGI-Quality said:
You say it's weaker than some current gen games / engines. OK. Using Uncharted 2 and Gears of War 3 as examples (your examples), how is it weaker than the Naughty Dog Engine 2.0 and Unreal 3?
As for "debating with a bias" - I don't see how you can argue realistically and then present an unreasonable, biased comparison to support a viewpoint. However, there's really no need to continue with that - as it's an obvious dead end.
|
Ok. I'll end this debate with how I started it. My opinion, based on overall appearance and with the consideration of polygon count and other graphic rendering aspects, is that Uncharted 2 and Gears of War 3 look better than the Unity 4 tech demo. I don't really have any argument other than that, based on my own preferences, I think that those games look better and are more appealing to my eyes than the Unity 4 tech demo. I've already stated that this is my own opinion and that I know others will have their own opinions different that mine. You disagree and don't think my opinion is valid. That's why I've kept up with this argument.
By the way, I don't feel that my comparisons are as biased as you say. Please tell me how they are grossly unfair.
|
I've not once said your opinion was invalid, but OK. At least you elaborated on Uncharted 2 and Gears 3 - which yes I disagree with, but that's OK.
That last set of sentences is a contradiction, though. You asked how it was unfair but admitted several times that the comparison was just that. You know why it wasn't fair and just why I said it wasn't realistic. Video caps vs screenshots - tells the story on its own.
|
You basically implied that my opinion was invalid by saying that I didn't take into account the polygons and other graphic rendering aspects. You said "I just don't get it", although I do. Why don't you read that post again.
I used the word "grossly". I've already admitted that the comparisons were a bit unfair, but not unfair enought to disregard them.
