CGI-Quality said:
bananaking21 said:
CGI-Quality said:
bananaking21 said:
it in no way looks fantstic specially when compated to other next gen tech domo's, hell quantic dreams kara's tech demo blows this one away and that was one year old tech
|
Well, since it's obviously not factual, neither side is wrong.
To me, it looks like a next-gen engine and makes its point above current gen technology (which is the purpose). And no, Quantic Dream's newest engine does not outperform this. TUnity 4's polygon count is higher and use of anti-aliasing is better, among other obvious advantages.
|
ofcourse the poly count is higher thats is a next gen demo, but the skin rendering and facial animations (which is what mostly was shown in the kara tech demo and what we can and should compare is skin rendering and charecter models in which kara beats this tech demo
|
Again, I disagree, especially since I know all of the ins and outs of that Kara demo. It just doesn't top this. And in regards to the poly count - I said it is one of several advantages when contrasted with the Kara demo.
Still, I don't want to turn the topic into a needless, off-topic battle. So just agree to leave it here.
|
Well I dont know the ins and outs. But I think Cryteks tech demo, Kara, Unreal Samaritan all looked much better in all aspects. Unity 4 might be the beter engine. But I didnt see it in any of this demo. Lighting, facial animations, reflections etc etc.
The others wowed me. This didnt.
