So yeah, Still trying to figure out why everyone is claiming the Vita is "copying the PSP's failures." Nobody can ever be consistent I've noticed. Over on the other thread, someone was saying "the Vita is failing the same way the PSP did, Sony is relying too heavily on third parties..." I stopped reading there. Why in the world would people assume this is true? the Vita's first major release was Uncharted....alongside wipeout 2048, Modnation racers, Lumines and Little Deviants...how many of those were developed by first parties? Even so, there's plenty of portable versions of established PS exclusive franchises.
I just don't get why people are trying SO hard to make the Vita look horrible. It's disappointing, it's financially a failure so far...but it's not bad. while the sales threads are annoying and pessimistic, they do in fact have some logical ground, but the thing that bothers me the most is easily the "Vita has no games" argument. It's not just here on the forum, it's in the Gamrreview team and on virtually every article I read online, and there's absolutely no weight to it.
you could argue there's only a half dozen games on it, which is technically next to no games...but you also have to factor in the fact that it's only been out for six damn months with its first holiday ahead of it still!
Why do people have to be so negative! I'm really loving the system, and I'll be there to support it till the end! I'll even get my brother one! Planning on getting him an Assassin's Creed bundle.
Oh, and it's too expensive compared to the 3DS, that's a HUGE factor. Sony has some MAJOR management issues, but the system itself is incredibly awesome.
My Console Library:
PS5, Switch, XSX
PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360
3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android
