noname2200 said:
By that line of rhetoric, are only laws passed with the worst intentions ever good? Perhaps you do understand the law's rationale after all, and merely did a terrible job of expressing your disapproval of it? Your example is certainly poor, seeing as how you analogized the relationship between a group of high school students and their teacher to a relationship between a professional and her clientele (bonus points: the person who's approval is sought by the other party is precisely the opposite in these two situations). That led me to try to explain the law.
As an aside, I also don't believe this behavior warrants jail time, at least not without a showing of actual coercion. Unethical and illegal behavior are different, after all. This concludes my post. |
I understand why politicians and others try to make laws like these to try and prevent certain things from happening, but they don't do any good. They're just complete overkill. Sometimes, like my two examples show, they even backfire and do more harm than good. Just because I understand why certain people do certain things doesn't mean I agree with it. I think the law is a terrible law. If you're already fired for cause and lose your ability to ever teach again, prison time is totally outrageous. It wasn't a violent crime. It's a waste of taxpayer dollars to be fed and give shelter in prison for having group sex with horny eighteen year olds in the privacy of your own home. Disgusting as it may be.








