Kasz216 said:
Now that's a totally unfair position on his views. This sentor believes (likely) that at conception, that life is a human life, because if not aborted it will grow into a baby and a human. So therefore that child is a human. So he IS thinking it from the view of the loved on in particular. The baby.
I don't agree with him, but at the very least it's worth understanding where he is coming from. He said something stupid enough that his argument doesn't need to be strawmaned to hell. |
How is it an unfair position on his views? At the end of the day it's the decision he wants taken. I basically boiled away everything else including the reasoning and arguments and then asked the reader to decide for themselves who the decision should be left to. I mentioned the emotional trauma of the woman because there would be many nameless women out there that would be forced to endure this that this politician won't even know exists.