happydolphin on 20 August 2012
| Chark said:
Incentives for gamers are incentives for sales, they are the ones buying after all. The question is to what effect will it have.
You seem to be confusing the issue by linking cost to develop a port on Vita with the cross buy feature. Developers already port their games and cross buy is not part of their decision to port in the first place, it's to acces a different install base and to make their game more accessible to consumers. Adding crossbuy is another subject, no one is using cross buy as an incentive to pot but as an feature for existing or future ports. The disincentive is loosing people who buy both, but that demographic is severally limited so this list of incentives provides an argument as to why doing cross buy could yeild greater ROI while not eliminating the ROI used to justify porting which is to access the user base that only owns one console.
|
@bold. I know that, I'm not retarded. I'm just not convinced there is enough demand to attract considerable sales, especially sales that would sell HW like you mentioned.
Yes, now that I understand that it costs nothing, I understand what you mean. But how is it possible, how does it not cost anything, is the Vita truly 100% compatible with the PS3? Is it streamed? I am confused.
