| klystron said: You should have taken the Wendy's job as others have said. However, others haven't really said why you should have. It shows an employer character when you do what you have to do to stay afloat. Why would they hire a welfare queen with an MSIS when they could get one who was flipping burgers for a year? It shows character. You clearly have none. You get online and whine about your situation rather than going out and doing something about it. Sure there are lots of low paying jobs out there, and that sucks. But taking one to spare the taxpayers your mooching and trying to improve yourself in some way is sure better than sitting around doing nothing. For the record I supported Bunning's filibuster. Let's force the takers to work crap jobs while they find something better instead of sitting around feeling like they are "better than that." I'll send you a PM as we have openings. Not sure if you are willing to relocate. I won't be assisting you with a reference though. |
What Wendy's job? I said I would of taken a Wendy's job, if it is available. Reality is that there wasn't one. Of course, you don't see this. What I did was that I ended up contact the regional manager of Wendy's in response for work, looking for something, and he ended up saying he wanted someone with quick service experience.
Again, there was no Wendy's job. And your ranting is fine... if you aren't looking at an actually unemployment rate of around 20%. I am up for doing anything now. And your Welfare Queen comment goes WAY beyond insulting. It shows a total disconnect with reality. Such a person doesn't exist. If they do exist, it would be as someone engaging in mass fraud with the welfare system...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_queen
I should also particularly emphasis you being clueless here, because I did accept a part-time janitor position, only to lose it because of my back. I was sent home actually and it got worse and I had to resign. So, I suggest you take your cluelessness and stuff it.
