By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
digitalnasties said:
Soleron said:
digitalnasties said:
Hell yeah! wikileaks was great for the Taliban who used Wikileaks to hunt and murder people named.


Please link some evidence that specific people died.

 It was a mistake by Wikileaks to not redact those names but it doesn't invalidate their purpose.


http://registan.net/index.php/2010/07/30/taliban-use-wikileaks-to-hunt-murder-named-afghans/

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/wikikills_LBS03WQRVZuuTYuTYN2t5L

http://minx.cc/?post=304084

 

sethnintendo said:
digitalnasties said:
Hell yeah! wikileaks was great for the Taliban who used Wikileaks to hunt and murder people named.

Provide one example.  I dare you.

Get off your ass and use google!

From what I gathered from the few links you provided it was only Afghans being targeted.  I really don't give a shit about any of those bs wars anymore.  Who cares if ~100 people ("The Taliban reportedly has targeted at least 100 Afghans identified in the documents as informants for the US-led counterinsurgency -- and may already have claimed its first victim.") were killed from the report.  That is about the same as a few bombs being dropped at the beginning of the war.  So now I am supposed to care for these civilians because they are being killed over a supposed document when millions of civilians have already been killed in the two bs wars.  Basically, I don't give a fuck.  What is a few more hundred lives added to the millions?  Nothing