Somehow the review system is flawed. Im pretty sure the game is better than the Wii version or the DS version it just has no novelty bonus now. So how can a game that is not worse than another game get a lower score? How does this work? Sure the music sucks by now etc but its the same music the Wii version had plus NSMB2 has cooler levels with more secrets like the oldschool games.
Isnt this a Bonus? And what about the coins etc?
Seriously if people can give COD 9's all the time they can also give Mario a 9 argh i dont get it the system is faulty....
Well anyways I lost interest in this series because its always the same but does this really make it a game that deserves a lower score? I mean I also dont play Super Mario Bros1 all the time because the game doesnt change its not worse then before right?
P.S. NSMBU would be a great DLC game. Instead of letting us pay 40 bucks and another 50 bucks and another 50 bucks etc for the "whole" games, they should just make DLC instead if sequels because its always the same.
You dont really need the next game if you have a prior one. So giving us New Super Mario Bros WiiU 2 for 10 bucks as DLC would be good especially when the new game will again feature the same music and graphics etc.....
