| oniyide said:
I should have been more clear, i didnt mean that. i just meant looking at past Ninty consoles, when they start out, you usually dont see a steady increase in graphical fidelity. Wii sure as hell didnt have it for obvious reasons. GC didnt really have it either. N64 kinda did, the Banjoe games looking better than Mario 64. Look at Uncharted, the difference between the sequel and the original is almost night and day. I know the hardcores will be happy they always are. I think Ninty could have def, pushed the envelope further, and im sure SOny and MS will do likewise, maybe not PS2-PS3 madness, but probably traditional leaps like PS1-PS2 and if that happens it wont paint Ninty in a good light IMHO. Remember this is coming SIX years later, thats not a short time. Its not like GC or N64 where those debutted about a year? after Sony's machines Even if AC3 runs at those speeds thats still not the leap im talking about. In fact that would sound a bit like the difference between PS2-GC, that was ok because that came a year later, but six years later?? Not impressed |
@1. I'm not sure what you guys are arguing anymore, but
NES: SMB -> SMB3
SNES: FFII -> FFIII
N64: Goldeneye -> Perfect Dark
GC: Waverace -> Twilight Princess
Wii: Twilight Princess -> Xenoblade
Those are some considerable increases.
@PS3 vs WiiU = PS2 vs GC. That is not an apples to apples comparison. For that, you would have to compare end of gen PS2 games to early gen PS3 games, and same with end of gen Xbox games to early gen 360 games.
