Nintendo finishes rock bottom of "conflict minerals" company rankings

[Viper1]

crissindahouse said:

you don't think nintendo would show what they do if they would do something like the other companies? i don't really understand how all people can believe nintendo would live with such a report if they wouldn't do less than others.

that's surely just my opinion but i really don't see the reason why other companies say what they do and nintendo not if they do a lot for good reputation.

if you would be a huge company and would do as much as your competition in this case, wouldn't you try to explain that so you wouldn't look like the worst? companies always try to get a good reputation everywhere if they can, i don't see why they shouldn't try here.

Criss, Nintendo has a policy of not partakign in these surveys unless it's part of the Japanese government regulations.

They have a great green energy policy but Greanpeace scores them a 0 every single year because they don't file a report with Greanpeace.   Same with this survey.

Happens every year.  Those familiar with the company, investors, share holders, government boards, etc...all have an understanding of this issue.  And because it means nothing to them in the corporate world, why both spending the money to compile these reports when it's not needed?