pezus said:
curl-6 said:
Well there's your answer. You have 70 games and 20% are new IPs, that's 7 games. If you have 200, that's 20.
The real reason for the "no games" argument is that while you and others may not be keen on Nintendo franchises like Mario and Zelda, (even I'm not if it's on a portable) a huge number of people are, hence something like Mario Kart 7 will have much more draw power than say, Wipeout on Vita. They say "no games" but what they mean is "not enough big name games."
What I find unfair is that the Vita is expected, less than a year into its lifespan, to measure up to the 1.5 year old 3DS. The Vita needs time to grow.
|
Something went wrong with your math there buddy 
|
My maths teacher was hot so I never paid attention in class :P
Games are a bigger (percieved) problem than price in my opinion. The mass market will put in the cash if the product has software they really want; look at how well the PS3 did at $299, which is arguably above mass market price.