By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:
richardhutnik said:

Do you care to show what percentage of single women view the government as they husband?

Not really, but I would imagine it's whatever percentage of single women vote Democrat. i.e., a majority of them. Basically, all of those Sandra Fluke types who think the government should keep its laws off of their bodies while paying for what they do with those bodies think of government as their husband. Or sugar daddy, more like.

richardhutnik said:

It also would definitely end up being a sure sign of a woman being stupid, if she can't tell the difference between a man/human and an artificially created entity that taxes and enforces laws.

You really are a very literal person, aren't you?

Hey, if I am going to try to give Coulter the benefit of the doubt here, I need to parse the word she says.  There is specific meaning into what involves a husband and so on.  And, since I believe Coulter likely stands against any variation of any traditional definition of marriage (that which is between a man and a woman), then I would see she had issues with anything or anyone else being that role.  A husband by traditional definition (it is one I hold), wouldn't allow anyone else but a man be a husband for a woman.  So no, I don't believe a woman can marry the government.  And I am fairly sure no one could divorce themselve from the government.  If they could, then Tea Party folks, and Libertarians, would of filed for divorce long ago.