Jay520 said:
|
That's not really what I was trying to say though. A person could behave contrarily to his heart for a time so as to appear different than his nature, but that would be temporary cloaking. A person could also behave contrarily to his heart and have that mold him via side-effects (like is the case for undercover cops).
Yes, you actions can mold your heart, but in the end the deepest core of your heart will always stay the same. Think Darth Vader. So in essence, no, the heart is not something you can control. Rather it's your identity, your deepest inclinations and desires.
I don't think a person should be judged by inclinations. I think everyone has different gradient of evil vs good in their heart. It's not black & white - there isn't a group of evil people and a group of good people. We are spread across a spectrum of good vs evil. Some people are at the extremes of the spectrum, but most of us lie somewhere in the middle. We all have a bit of evil in us imo. |
Nothing here I disagree with.
What's important is how they control [evil] imo. And the only way to control it, is by overcoming it with actions. |
Yeah, you could say that. In which case evil would be external to the person, not inherent, basically something they can shake off. Not so in all cases imho.