By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kitler53 on 08 August 2012
Edit Thread
Kenology said:
outlawauron said:
...

Not everyone is out to get Nintendo.

MH did come to my mind because I faintly remember it having a subscirption for Japan, so you could possibly compare if you had access to the number of subscribers. Can't do a straight one as you can still play MH3 without fee and single player.

You're right, not everybody is - but he clearly was.

Anyways, Monster Hunter can be played and enjoyed without ever going online ever.  DQX cannot.  Even if it has multiplayer subscriptions, gamers will not stay on an MH for long because Capcom doesn't add new content - they just release standalone updates (G versions).  Even still beyond multiplayer subscriptions, MH is NOT an MMO even in the slightest.  So it's not a valid comparison.

@outlawaurn - i know my reputation.  kenology's question was fair.

@kenology - i wasn't trying to spin anything here.  it was just something that came to mind as i remembered it had a subscription fee with it in japan and i was attempting to add to the discussion.