It's funny to me how no matter what, everything always seems to look like bad news for Nintendo.
Wii U was getting lots of "old ports" like Arkham City, Mass Effect 3, Darksiders II, Madden & FIFA '12, Battlefield 3, Ninja Gaiden 3, Tekken Tag Tournament 2. So many people were complaining that these games are old, that there's no point porting them if they'll already have been available on other consoles for three months to a year. Wii U needed more "current" games like RE6 and Bioshock Infinite with more-or-less simultaneous releases on all consoles, the way ACIII is happening.
Now it comes out that work on one of these ports may have been cancelled to focus on a future game getting a simultaneous release, and people complain. That's bad for Nintendo. One of the games Wii U supposedly didn't need has been cancelled to focus on a game everyone said Wii U DOES need, and it's BAD?
MAKE UP YOUR MINDS, GAMERS: would Battlefield 3 have been a good title for Wii U to get? If so, you effectively admit that getting Mass Effect 3 and Arkham City are good moves. Or is it good that EA has decided to focus on porting newer games? At least try to be consistent!
