pezus said:
Jay520 said:
pezus said:
DieAppleDie said:
"Please tell me how a 3D functionality (which the minority even uses) is more innovative than a back and front touch screen. You can be in denial all you want, but there is nothing particularly innovative about the 3DS in itself."
show me some data or article related to that minor use of the 3D you are refering, i guess you are making an assumption on that to support your point...whatever it is...
back touch is barely used by any game.....front touch screen? come on, you are losing powers my friend
xD |
There is no data except feedback from this very forum. Most people appear to turn it off, at least the biggest gamers here I see. And that is besides the point. 3D is not innovative in any way. Even PS3 does 3D.
|
Can any other platform do 3D with no glasses? I don't think so.
P.S. i agree that 3D isn't innovative but you have to cover every apparent flaw in your argument. |
3D with no glasses is still 3D though...I see no problem with wearing glasses with my 3D (especially if it makes it better).
|
Not sure what that favorite sentence is supposed to mean. Products can serve the same purpose as past products, but can be considered innovative if they do so in a more convenient/efficient manner. Since many people consider glasses to be annoying, the 3DS can be considered innovative because it accomplishes a task (3D) more conveniently than before. ( No Glasses)
