crissindahouse said:
that just makes no sense. i know that this is the system but it just makes no sense. it is destroying the worth of a second and third place hugely. the second and third place are worth almost nothing because of that system. no clue how someon can think a system which makes even the second place almost worthless is a good system just because they had this system alrady 100years or so ago and wonÄt change it. if we would have a point system for 100 years now no one would think a country with one fiorst place should rank higher than a country with 30 second places. i',m pretty sure you would also think that is a bad idea if you wouldn#t know this system since you live. you are just used to it. |
But...isn't that the point of the competition? First place is what everyone wants no? This is the height of competition, not a bunch of 9yr olds on Sport's day.
The old rules used to be "Gold of get the fuzz out" because that was what everyone wanted until they eventually introduced silver and bronze.
I've said it once before, I'll say it again.
ask ANY athlete what colour they REALLY want and they will all say Gold. If you start count silvers and bronze as the equal to Gold then Gold becomes meaningless and we might as well go back to the "gold or get the fuzz out" years, because that's esscentially what you are asking for.








