Kantor said:
The very word "socialised" is poisonous to Americans, so "universal" is probably a better term to use, though it can mean multiple things. The thing about national health insurance is that either you force everyone to pay in, in which case if you want high quality care you need to pay for insurance twice, or you allow people to opt out, in which case it can't be funded because the wealthy who provide most of the funding opt out and get private health insurance. |
If everyone is willing to pay a tax its fine (Tax is a dirty word over here just like socialism as you know). Most of the healthcare most people have in other countries like Germany, Britain, France, Japan, etc is an archetype of a medical care system built by FDR in the New Bill of Rights in the US. Sadly he died before it couldbe finalized (The private corporations loved that part of the story), but after WWII when nations were being rebuilt they got to enjoy the healthcare and job security that was initially meant for us. The point of it all was to protect American citizens from the arm of the private sector that didnt care about the rights of the workers. I've gone to medical centers outside of the US and many countries get some of the same medicine and healthcare for far less. The vein of the American system is too broken to give it socialized medicine now. Something major would have to happen.