Alby_da_Wolf said:
Trying to piss off both parties in an argument is the definitive form of neutrality! |
I agree. But there's a big difference between disagreeing with a person's political position and then stripping an individual of their rights, in this case a business owner.
Whereas the anti-gay-marriage groups do it via lobbying (the correct channel imho), the alderman actually deprived an individual of a basic right. I don't think it's acceptable at all.