| Mr Khan said:
legally? Certainly. Morally, i'm less certain. This is definitely one of those things that the ACLU could use to earn some more right-wing credentials |
You're both right and wrong. I showed you why morally it was wrong. It's an afront to an individual for his beliefs. There are other ways to deal with disagreeing with an individual's beliefs, no matter how influencial he may be (unless he's a politician, then you just don't vote for him).
You're right to say this is a case of the ACLU to look into. Then again, there are so many organizations that support questionable groups and communities, to target the most controversial one may not be the place to start, imho, since by definition it being controversial means it's still unclear whether Cathy's position is morally wrong or not.
The case against a racist would be much simpler.
