| Wonktonodi said:
haven't looked much at the paper yet, but interesting how in this case I think it was made less clear then it had been. By saying you can't except for marital unfathfullness. It probably means there was no change for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agunah as well as woment still being subject to needed the man to grant a divorce since he was still referring to is as the men divorcing. Although reminds me of those who make the argument if you want to restore the sanctity of marriage outlaw divorce.
I'm not sure how much that covers rape vs an odd divorce law. I think we have taken this thread a bit off topic though. We might need to start a "bible discussion" thread |
I am all for it. Start it, or I will, and we can answer each others' questions I'm sure we can at least make some headway.
