The one thing that upsets me about some of you, and I'm going to stir the pot a little bit because I want to confront you guys with this, is that some of you, Bouzane yes I'm mostly talking about you, are so quick to take sides against the rights of the religious community, yet in cases like Oreo there is tremendous amount of backlash by the internet community as a whole. Can anyone explain this unfairness at all?
Why is one community allowed more defense than another? Is one a victim and the other the aggressor so that people support one less than another? I'd like to know your thoughts.
For example, an case of oppressing the rights of a member of LGBT community would be to refuse someone a job in their restaurant because of their sexual orientation. That is wrong because it has nothing to do with their moral values. To me it would seem that the topic of marriage is a completely different matter.
It's like the topic of the age of consent. If a person thinks it's okay to have sexual relations with a 13, 14 year old when he/she is older than 20, why should that person be stripped of any human right? But when it comes to sexual relations and marriage, people have a right to voice their opinions on the matter from their moral standpoint.
