happydolphin said:
At this point I don't expect you to see it any different no matter the evidence brought forth to be honest. If you agree that COD is what forced Nintendo to come up with the UpadPro, I'm all out of patience. If you're really curious, go to the articles I linked to and you'll see my replies there. @this
No, not everyone forgets. I'm very aware. Nevertheless it was a radical difference from his usual rantings, so as such I was pleasantly surprised by his professionalism as compared to what I usually read of him. |
What evidence?
What evidence did Nintendo need for the UpadPro? Probably the fact that no major IP released with a proper port to the Wii's control scheme. COD is simply the figurehead of that. Half of the developers last generation didn't push their IPs into the Wii for that reason among others (the other primarily being cost to port due to graphical limitations).
Weak third party support? Which developers and publishers have you talked to? What did they say about their support of the console?
Wii U not next-gen? That should be pretty obvious. The power of the WiiU is certainly not next-gen. Heck, the $99 OUYA is coming with similar horsepower out of the box. That should tell you something about what Nintendo put into the system.
In this case, Pachter is going to be right. The WiiU will sell <50m units through its lifespan, and Nintendo will be in a very precarious situation, as their handheld market will continue to deteriorate.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.







