Viper1 said:
Given that they haven't used the "R***" codenames since 2008 and the rumor came well after 2008, that raises the dubious meter to full tilt right there. And that last time was the R700 (HD 4xxx) line. Can you imagine a rumor claiming to use a GPU 3 generations up? And even if it were only 18 computer units, it is claiming to be a Tahiti die which wouldn't make any sense to have that much wasted silicon taking up space. Almost half of your 352mm2 isn't even being used. May as well just use a Pitcairn and drop clocks. |
Actually they did refer to Evergreen as R800 up until launch, also the R1k has been in development since 2007 http://www.theinq.com/default.aspx?article=42297. But the assumption that it predates the name change is mine, it could well be that they still use the RXXXX internally or it was made up by the article writer, many people still refer to the new AMD GPU architectures by the R number even if AMD don't publically, the Beyond 3D rumour and speculation threads, and the first acurate leaks of Tahiti GPUs http://www.3dcenter.org/news/2011-11-28.
And it doesn't actualy claim it's a Tahiti die, it said "this is code-named "Tahiti."" Not "this is a Tahiti die" or "it is based on the HD 7970".
It is quite possibly bullshit, but I still don't think it ever suggested a HD 79X0 GPU, in fact the specs provided don't match any existing GPU so suggest that it is a custom chip that happens to share a codename with the HD 79X0 and is bassed on the R1000/Southern Islands/GCN architecture.
@TheVoxelman on twitter