Nem said:
|
Thats one of the most absurd things I've ever heard. Absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. That is the one of the most common logical thoughts.
Its also worth pointing out that you cant actually ''prove'' anything related to this topic. Even the most commonly believed things are not ''proven''. You can not prove theory of evolution or even thoery of gravity either. You would need a proof for that. The only abstract of study that relies on complete proof is mathematics. There is a difference between evidence and proof. The difference being that, evidence is something that suggests or points out towards a specifi theory or scenario and proof completly removes any doubt and absolutely confirmes a theory.







