bouzane said:
Slimebeast said:
As an evangelical myself I have no problem to admit I have an obsession with Israel though. And it's for supernatural reasons, based on Biblical prophecies, not some hypocritical quasi-ethical lies that the socialists put forth (and some people from the Arab world too, but in their defense; that's only for tactical reasons - to make the Israeli-Arab conflict appear as a human-rights issue in front of a naive Western world). I want Israel to win and to keep Jerusalem forever, and I know they will win no matter how much Satan and the world hates them.
American nukes are no threat to the world. It's ridiculous to claim otherwise. What happened in the 40's is not relevant today.
The Mullah controlled Iran is an entrely different issue. Their hate towards Israel, and like Kasz described, in a desperate situation that nuclear threat would be a very serious threat. Then there's the risk of smaller dirty bombs. It's not wild fantasies to imagine a nuclear Iran sell primitive dirty bombs to Hizbollah to use against Israel. Such a scenario could hurt Israel a lot and with Israel's hands pretty tightly tied politically it wouldn't be that easy for them to retaliate if they wouldn't have clear evidence (and the world would blame them anyway).
|
It's terrifying to think that this mentality is common. It makes my blood run cold. No offense but religious fanaticism is the same on both sides and it will lead to the destruction of our paradise.
American nukes aren't a threat to the world!? What is your definition of a threat?
You know, people keep talking about the threat Iran poses to Israel but I see a lot more threat beings made against Iran.
PS. It's spelled Hezbollah.
|
If a name originates from Arabic there is no unversal rules how it is written in the Western world with our alphabets. We use a phonetical approach to spell it, which is why you see many different versions of a name - such as Mohammed, Mohammad and Mohamed. Ghadaffi, Khadaffi, Gadafi, Ghadafi etc.
