DirtyP2002 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
DirtyP2002 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
sales2099 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
sales2099 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Core games or not they still sucked. They aren't investing in core games the way they should be. |
Certainly making a better effort then Nintendo.
But XBLA seems to be where they are taking risks with new content. Spelunky is a MS published game, coming out next week, getting great reviews.
|
Microsoft has proven that they've tried with high risk titles and failed too many times, which is why they always take the cheap route with XBLA. High reward for low risk. They only care to invest in proven franchises which literally are less than a handful. They aren't good at making exclusives and two generations is proof of that enough for the blind. Nintendo doesn't make enough core titles but when they pump out a Metroid, Zelda, Mario or any of their stable it tends to be a hit. My only worry for them is making a new IP.
|
High reward with low risk.........literally the dream spot for any company to aspire to, in this case creating great experiences at a fraction of the cost at a fraction of the price for us gamers. Its metacritic score also carries as much weight as a big budget game because fun is fun and quality is quality no matter the polygon count. And your making it sound like a bad thing......
I also see nothing wrong with investing in proven franchises that gamers want. Seems they know their boundaries. Big budgets go to franchises the fans want and care about. New ideas, fresh gameplay, and variety now lies in XBLA. Beats investing tens of millions into a game thats literally hit or miss.
|
It is not a dream spot. To have to lower the quality of games just to make a profit is pushing nothing. It's just smart is all itis, the way games are moving isn't moving upwards or downwards, just in a the same place its always been to be quite frank. Microsoft fails at titles because they aren't a creative company. Microsoft is only at their best when they find a proven project and invest in it. Microsoft could leave the gaming industry and still publish games and profit off of those. They did it before they even came into the race. I could care less whether they stay or go to tell the truth, outside of Halo and Gears they are irrelevant to the cause of gaming. Don't take this to heart, this is just my opinion. Outside of functional online and Halo Microsoft has brought aggressive marketing the likes Sony and Nintendo have never dealt with. If they are to learn a lesson from them it is that. I've invested enough in Microsoft for two generations and their best games imho dont come from them.
|
This is the point where you are wrong.
Look at the franchises MS keeps investing in.
- Halo: sold millions, fans love it, game innovates with every sequel, every major Halo is rated higher than 90 on meta
- Gears of War: sold millions, fans love it, every game is 90+ on meta.
- Forza: sold millions, unmatched quality in this genre, every game is 90+ on meta.
Sony was not able to build a franchise as successful as these in the past 10 years. People like you go all out and praise Sony for delivering new IPs, but that is just because their new IPs flop. Do you think we will ever see a major Twisted Metal game again? Will there be a Starhawk 2? Resistance is officialy dead already. MAG 2 won't happen either. Modnation Racers looks unlikely to me.
The only game that COULD be mentioned is LBP from the PS3 generation, but this franchise is in sharp decline from LBP to LBP 2 and doing a Karting game and Media Molecule working on a new IP does not show me Sony will heavily invest in this franchise in the future.
From the PS2 generation there is God of War, a game that absolutely fits in the category of the MS games and guess what - Sony does the same as MS.
|
You never proved me wrong.
1. Gears is third party. As I said before third party "exclusives" always in mass overshadowed the bulk of Microsofts first party because it was always weak.
2. I never denied Halo, Project Gotham, Fable or Forza, but they stand on their own and they were the only surviving franchises to next gen where the list dwindled further. Microsoft left the Project Gotham team to rot with Activision. Hopefully Microsoft does the merciful thing and just lets Fable die after Molyneux and his team go onto other ventures.
3. Of course Sony has always had a more successful franchise than Project Gotham and Forza combined. It's called Grand Turismo.
Sony is always pushing fresh new IP's which may not be marketed properly but are quickly becoming the face of their platform. I don't care if they dont have as much acclaim as a handful of titles. A gamer should take pride in enjoying various experiences and overcoming them. Case closed.
|
- Gears is 2nd party, published by MS. Epic called themselves even first party before.
- Ehm you denied Fable in your previous post. You called it a letdown 50 Minutes ago!
- Gran Turismo is not a franchise fom the past 10 years, isn't it?
Nice try though.
These new IPs did not sell well due to bad marketing, they sold bad, because they did not appeal to a lot of people and PS3 gamers did not want to spend $50 on it, because these games were not worth it according to them. Otherwise they would have bought them.
"A gamer should take pride in blabla" Is this now a religion and you are the leader telling me, a gamer, how I should behave? I am a gamer for the better part of my life and I would go nuts if MS stopped investing in Halo, Gears or Fable and only focus on new IPs that will be killed 1-2 years later.
|
