| logic56 said: 4. and that makes it worse don't you get it, that's the point of the outrage, this is suppose to the next main entry into the series and this is what they come up with...... this shit: fucking really??? shame..... shame on you Capcom smfh |
Okay, you don't even need to go any further. You clearly aren't a Monster Hunter fan, and it's super obvious.
For the little I've played of Monster Hunter Tri G, and the little I've seen of Freedom, I can already tell you that this looks 100 times better than those in terms of action and gameplay, and I'm not even a MH fan. If graphics are all you care about, then you're obviously not a true fan. And plus, even with graphics on par with the Wii version, it still looks fantastic, and will much more so on the portable screen.
When Squaresoft released Final Fantasy IV the after years, did I complain that it was in 2D? Certainly not. As a staunch fan of FF IV, I would have bought the game had it come out on a fricking Wonderswan for all I care.
Now that we've cleared out that nonesense, let me tackle your excuses:
|
1. not an opinion, if you can't see how vastly superior the Vita is to the 3DS then I don't know what to tell you You're shifting goalposts from overall hardware design to simply graphics and online. Fail. 2. and there you go with that Nintendo fan ultimatum, everything is black and white with you guys becasue you don't know the joys of the other side of the fence, blind loyalty and nostalgia gives you a very narrow view on things and that just sad, NO, they Don't have to focus on one OR the other, on PlayStation platforms they can focus on both equally, giving no more attention to either or, games can not only look great but they can play great as well I don't disagree that games can look good and play great. Problem is, the one that isn't seeing the other side of the coin is you, since you still don't concede that time spent on graphics is less time spent on depth. The accusations should now be placed back on the one truly with the narrow view. 3.wii vs ps3, that kinda answers itself It sure does, it answers that you're shifting the goalposts once again and fail to read what people tell you, hence throwing fire to a war that need not exist. The point wasn't Wii vs PS3, it was (Wii or PS3) vs PSP, both being vastly superior to the portable counterpart from a graphics PoV (the point of that subtopic). |
