By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Hmm, well the sole reason of it being on a different console is a little shallow minded. But let's take a look at the implications. My guess is that those people were PSP owners and they have come to like the style of handheld that Sony makes. They are probably dedicated to getting a Vita, a similarly styled vast improvement of that type of handheld. They probably had the expectation that Monster Hunter 4 would be on the Vita. With no word of one appearing on the Vita, you could understand if there is some agitation from the fans. Some will opt to buy a 3DS for it, others won't. They have already dedicated a good some of money for the entry price of one console that getting a second one could easily be out of the question. That and the 3DS has a vastly different style than the Vita, one that a person could not like. The systems are very different and some might find the lack of hardware power in the 3DS disappointing coming from the PSP, even though the 3DS is an improvement. People buy consoles and their replacements often because of games that will be on those system. Transferring exclusivity is not a popular move and just purchasing the console that title goes to is not an ideal solution since that probably is not the only game they are looking forward to. For instance, if you are a big Mario, Zelda, and Metroid fan and Zelda moves to a Sony console and you could only afford one console, you wouldn't forgo the Nintendo console that still had Mario and Metroid right? It's probably the same situation for plenty of these gamers. Going multiplatform or producing spin offs of a series is one thing, transferring exclusivity throws all the fans for a loop.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(