By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Araknie said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Araknie said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Araknie said:
Explanations for all, read it or you do it on purpose.

The title explains the part of "for me".
Now at the beginning of the post i say the games i own, so you can compare how many third parties are there in front of the first, but i will do math for you.

10 first party titles: SSBB, Metroid Prime 3, NSMBWii, DKCR, MKWii, Kirby's Epic Yarn, Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn, SMG2, Disaster, Xenoblade Chronicles. (yes Nintendo owns Monolith)
9 third party titles: NMH2, Boom Blox, Red Steel 2, Tales of Symphonia 2, Monster Hunter Tri-, Sonic Colours, Darkside Chronicles, Unlimited Cruise 2, Pandora's Tower.

So you see that in my experience Wii was perfectly balanced, stop saying that the list has mostly 1st party because isn't true. You can't really argue with fatcs.

So, this only proves that many of the hatred has come without reading the initial post.


The majority of those games are not third party man, hate to break it to you. You know what third party means? 


Yes, a third party, is a company without a contract of exclusive for doing their games only on that consoles ever, every game they do.

Suda51 is third party, EA is third party, Ubisoft is third, Namco-Bandai is third party, Capcom is third party, SEGA is third party, Ganbarion is under Namco-Bandai so third party.

All the games i said were third are, you know a thing called balance and reading posts. 

I don't have anything to say more, this is so clear, have about it.


Ok now that were over that, you do know that the HD consoles are drowning in hot third party titles compared to the Wii? If you were to compare the two it wouldn't be fair. 80% of the Wii's third party is crap.


That's why i said exclusives in the first post, i can totally agree with multiplatform but XBox360 and PS3 with large Third Party exclusives that make a person have 1:0,9 rate from 1st to 3rd parties in a personal collection? You know that's not even near it.

Multiplatforms sells but exclusives are good games, i'm a gamer that's what i'm interested with.

Also the PS2 had like the same rate of crap but it selled and anybody knows that has many many good games also because they are exclusives. Not comparing the Wii to the PS2, i totally agree that PS2 has more.

It's only a statement with PS3, 360 and Wii, Home Consoles that are out today. The more a consoles has good games, triple that for crap games. The Wii is only an example, the same was on PS2, PS1, SNES and NES. It's totally normal.


Are trying to make the point that multiple platform games are not good games?

Also the wii is nothing like the PS2, PS1  SNES etc. Although it is true that the more games you have the more shovelware you are going to find, the difference is the above platforms also have a ton classic 3rd party games which critics praised to the heaven and still have a lasting legacy. By any systems standards, your list of 3rd party games for the wii is poor, most of the 3rd titles mention recieved good but far from amazing reviews. Understandably you might love them, but the general consesus is against you.

The ps2 had games like FFX, Okami, Metal Gear solid 3, Tekken Tag tournanment, Grand theft auto 3, Devil May Cry...... your 3rd party list is not comparable. Has a 3rd party wii game ever scored above 90 on metacritic? I have a wii and I thought the the 3rd efforts were poor, games like Mad world and no more heroes were supposed to  entice me but they were terribly stale where gameplay is concerned. Okami and RE4 were the only 3rd part titles don't regret buying (never bought Red steel 2).