Though if I finallly get the full arguement it's that.
It should be legal because....
1) The government can pass a law that allows insurance companies to not refuse service to people with preexisting conditions and people who are at high risk for diseases.
2) Because this would make business unworkable, congress can then force anybody into the system... because they might use health insurance at some point... and even if they don't it will drive prices down.
I'm not seeing how number 2 applies... at all legally. You can say it makes sense from a "Keeping healthcare costs low" point of view... but so does all kinds of other unconstitutional stuff like forcing people to exercise. All congress needs to do to grab more power is to legislate extremly stupid laws that might destroy a form of commerce?
Your arguement seems to be...
3) is it's legal, because it's the only option presented in the law... and they didn't write in the actual legal ways in the law. Therefore they are invisible.
Which is stupid... and i'd point out... any hole makes something unconstitutional... and the fact that you acknowledge a hole means that you should see it as unconstiutional if being intellectually honest.
