What happens if ObamaCare is overturned?

[Mr Khan]

Kasz216 said:

Mr Khan said:

Kasz216 said:

I hope this is one of those cases where your so angry you can't form a coherent arguement.

A) You fell back on to "These people not doing something effects comerce in aggregate" which is EXACTLY what the court said would allow for any commerce to be forced if made legal.

 

B) Negligence laws apply to actions.  And for not doing a regulation that is part of that action.

For example, if you are working as  a pilot and violet a federal negligence law by not checking a gauge... that is because you were a pilot.

If you were a passanger or just some guy on the street you don't get charged.

 

There is no federal negilgence law tied to no action whatsoever.

You're a citizen who's liable at some point to draw upon a medical expense that you can't afford out-of-pocket. You said before that health care isn't an inevitability, but it is, if only end-of-life care or something.

A refusal to do your civic duty is an action.

What if tommorrow it gets ruled unconstituional, someone is taken off their parents life insurance.  they have a heart attack in their room, and die.  Not to be discovered until hours later.

There would be no medical bills. 

What if you specifically decide to not go to a hosptial your whole life, like a Christian Scientist.

What if before "end of life care" you die in your sleep.

Or you move to a different country.

Or the Police find you murdered.

Or you go to jail.  (State pays for that afterall.)

Or you fly to a different country for your healthcare.  (Though everybody seems to come here for that.)

Or since your qualfier is "can't afford out of pocket" what if your bill gates.  Should he be exempt from this law?  Should only the poor be forced to get health insurance?

 

Your grasping at straws here.  Just admit that you want it to be ruled consitutional and would rather something be ruled constituional then isn't, that see something happen that you think would be a big negative for the country.  I mean, that's a position I can respect.

Right now your just running on cognitive dissonance.

My qualifier is that health care is an inevitability in the aggregate. You're citing stuff that doesn't apply for the vast majority of people to state why it isn't an inevitability, and if judges are ruling like that, then they're the ones clutching at straws, because that then violates the spirit of things by going after technicalities.

Yes i want it ruled constitutional, but I also believe that there's really no sound argument against it.