By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
Mr Khan said:
 

No system is perfect, but i'd rather have a guarantee of care than the "screw you, kid" i'm about to get because of Roberts, his gang of crooks, and the death-dealing American insurance companies.

Care to trade?

Oh come now.  I know it might effect you personally,

but there is no doubt, that like citizens united it's a

"I don't think it's a good idea, but leagally it's sound."

If you want to argue that the supreme court should consider the effects of there actions and not just the constitution that's one thing....

but to call them crooks because they made a pure obvious constiutional call... I'd say that's the EXACT opposite of being a crook.

There's huge precedent of government involvement in health care and how health insurance, despite not being tradable over state lines, is a huge interstate issue. This one's commerce clause, plain and simple, and it's judicial activism from social darwinists who think that the constitution somehow enumerates property rights that never really existed in the first place to strike this law down. Not that Roberts and that mouth-breathing warlock Scalia care, they're rich, so what matters how the peons suffer for the social darwinist cause?



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.