By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin said:
Andrespetmonkey said:

I'm not saying they shouldn't exist or anything. I'm saying they're irrelevant to my interests, I don't care about them, and I want new IP, but that doesn't mean the new IP has to replace other franchises.

They are giving new IPs. Did you mean 1st or 3rd party? Also, their focus is on their mascots first, everything else second, so as a Nintendo fan, you would have to look beyond Mario if you're looking for new IPs on Nintendo's platform. However, it is up to Nintendo to also learn to better balance the limelight they give to mario along with other IPs.

Example, Castlevania 3DS was showcased at the 3DS presentation. Great!

But the question comes, is that only yet because there are so few top-tier 3rd party IPs to appear on the 3DS in the west? Maybe, but still above and beyond Castlevania there was Bravely Default, Fire Emblem and Layton that got 0 mention at the presentation. That's a fail. It needs to be better balanced imho.

1st party or 3rd. I don't really care about what they should do to be honest. Just saying that to satisfy me, they'll need to give me new IPs I'm interested in. ZombiU is a good example, Pikmin 3 looks promising (I know this obviously isn't new lol)... keep that shit up and I'll buy a Wii U. Mario and Zelda mean nothing to me. I can objectively look at those games and tell they are good, I just have no interest in playing them. 

I agree with most of what you said. This is just me being selfish and only thinking about what I want, but hey, that's what would satisfy me :P