The Logical Flaw of Religious Practicing

[IIIIITHE1IIIII]

PDF said:

IIIIITHE1IIIII said:

I said "just like", meaning that it applies for both scenarios. In both cases God would not get any closer to you, according to my conclusions which were never proven wrong to me.

Of course I don't think that everything that I write in my threads or anywhere is facts. But I do reach conclusions which seems to be very tough to get around.

People don't have to care about what I think. If they think that everything I write is bullshit then they might as well don'tevter my thread or start a discussion with me.

Then don't pretend they aren't opinion.  I think discussion and question are great as long as they dont come off pretentious.    I never attacked everything you say, in matter of fact, I tried to think about it and give a response. 

That's not how it works. When you talk to someone and say "Coke clearly taste better than Pepsi" it wouldn't make sense to end that sentence with ", in my opinion". The fact that it's an opinion is obvious, and politicians use this discussing method as well.

My only problem was you stating in a fact like manner that prayer was selfish and an illusion when there is no way to prove that.  I can easily say I have prayed and heard God and he told me what to do and it worked.  It was also in a case to help another person.  There done, I defunked your statement.  Good luck proving mine never happened.

Russel's teapot. It is not up to me to prove that.

All I am saying is when entereing sensitive subject matter, this is a good time to use the "I think" before statements.  I understand that is a bad form for an argument but it goes a long way for open discussion for matters like this.

By saying "I think" all thetime I wouldn't sound very convincing at all. Like I said, that's not how it works.