By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chris Hu on 18 June 2012
Edit Thread
Kasz216 said:
Chris Hu said:
Kasz216 said:
Chris Hu said:
Kasz216 said:
Chris Hu said:
Kasz216 said:
Chris Hu said:
killerzX said:
Chris Hu said:
killerzX said:
Chris Hu said:
killerzX said:



 

 

 



Because research tends to have these things called confidence intervals that are basically margin of errors that account for sample size.  First thing you learn about in research methods.

Oh... and for the Koch Brothers...

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/09/02/koch-brothers-give-more-to-charity-than-to-right-wing-causes/

The Koch Brothers have so much money its hard for them to spend it all on gaining more power through right wing causes so once in a while they have to give to charity.  You can be charitable and still be scum and a terrible person overall Ted Nugent is a prime example for that.


Or... they could just... not spend that money.  Rather then spend 6 times the amount on charity.    If it makes you feel better that despite the fact that conservatives give more to charity (including billionaries vs liberal billionaries) it doesn't matter because they're terrible people....

hey go for it.

As they say "You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into"

I find it ironic that a majority of the Koch Brothers charitable givings go to the medical field since their industrial empire caused numerous cases of cancer and various respiratory diseases.