Why didn't Nintendo make more realistic, violent games for the Wii just to prove 3rd parties wrong?

[Pavolink]

pezus said:

creampie said:
Pezus
1. True, mostly kids play CoD, Zelda is a much more mature game, so it has a less marketshare
2. Is not made by SOny or Msoft
3. Mario outsells all of them toghether, not very successful games...
4. PG is not arcade, Motorstorm barely sold 1m+, weres the success proven?
5. First person adventure
6. Not bad, thanks to the Halo name on it sold something, still not enough to prove themselves, no sequel? lol, what about Sony?

to sum up
Not even Sony and Msoft put toghether can achieve what Nintendo has done as a first party, both in quality and sales performance...

1. ...

2. Published by Sony in Japan. I'll give you another then: Folklore

3. Irrelevant

4. How do you classify a racing game as arcade? Motorstorm sold close to 4m. Try again.

5. What genre is that exactly? Name some big games of this type please.

6. Like I said, not a good fit for consoles.

This is all really irrelevant though, why would Sony/MS need to prove themselves in all genres? They already have all 3rd parties. 

To sum up: You are going off topic, it almost hurts.

Metroid Prime.