Why didn't Nintendo make more realistic, violent games for the Wii just to prove 3rd parties wrong?

[oniyide]

pezus said:

creampie said:
they dont believe in realistic violent games, they put more enfasis in the fun factor and gameplay mechanics, they try to cater to a wider audience...
also we could ask why Sony or Microsoft havent made any action rpg, plataformer adventure, arcade racer, FP adventure, RTS...etc. to prove themselves?
Also if you are suggesting that core games are the realistic looking or violent themed or M rated ones, then you have no idea what you are talking about...

Which series reaches a wider audience: Zelda or CoD?

Action RPG? Demon's Souls

Platformer? R&C, Sly, Banjo

Arcade Racer? Motorstorm, PGR etc.

FP adventure? What is this?

RTS? Not fit for consoles, but Halo Wars.

Mirror's Edge could fit in the FP adv category.